NEW DELHI — Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) national spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla on Thursday launched a sharp attack on the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), alleging financial extravagance and deviation from its founding principles in connection with the ongoing “Sheesh Mahal” controversy.
Addressing the media in Delhi, Poonawalla referred to findings from a Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report, claiming that during the COVID-19 pandemic, a lavish residence—dubbed ‘Sheesh Mahal’—was constructed at a cost ranging between ₹50 to ₹60 crore. He alleged that the expenditure included high-end furnishings such as luxury curtains, premium flooring, and other expensive interior elements.
According to Poonawalla, the issue is particularly concerning given the timing of the alleged spending, as it occurred during a period when the country was grappling with the challenges of the pandemic. He argued that such expenditure raises serious questions about priorities in governance and the use of public funds.
He further claimed that new details have emerged regarding what he described as a “Sheesh Mahal 2.0,” suggesting that plans for additional or expanded luxury arrangements have come to light. While he did not provide specific documents during the statement, he asserted that the blueprint of these developments reflects continued extravagance.
Poonawalla contrasted these allegations with the original promises made by the Aam Aadmi Party at the time of its formation. He said that AAP had pledged to maintain simplicity in governance, including commitments such as living in modest housing, avoiding large bungalows, and not adopting VIP culture.
“This is the same party that said it would live in a small house, would not buy a big bungalow, and would stay away from VIP security,” he said, adding that recent developments indicate a departure from those commitments.
The BJP spokesperson also alleged that the AAP leadership has expanded its footprint beyond Delhi, pointing to what he described as the acquisition of a large bungalow in Punjab. He claimed that such actions are inconsistent with the party’s earlier positioning as a movement rooted in simplicity and anti-corruption ideals.
In a pointed remark, Poonawalla said that the party no longer reflects its original identity, referring to it as the “Aalishan Aadmi Party” instead of the Aam Aadmi Party, implying a shift towards luxury and elitism.
He emphasised that the matter is not just about political rivalry but about accountability and public trust. According to him, citizens have the right to question how government resources are utilised, especially during times of crisis.
Poonawalla further stated that the BJP would continue to raise the issue and seek clarity, suggesting that the controversy could have broader implications for governance and transparency in Delhi.
The AAP, led by Arvind Kejriwal, has consistently denied allegations related to excessive spending, describing them as politically motivated and misleading. Party leaders have argued that the claims are part of a campaign to discredit their governance record.
Political analysts note that the “Sheesh Mahal” controversy has become a major flashpoint in the ongoing political contest in Delhi, with both sides presenting sharply contrasting narratives. While the BJP is focusing on issues of expenditure and accountability, AAP has sought to counter the allegations by highlighting its policy initiatives and administrative achievements.
The issue has also gained traction on social media, where it has sparked debates, satire, and partisan reactions. Observers suggest that such controversies often influence public perception, particularly when they involve questions of integrity and governance standards.
Poonawalla concluded by reiterating that transparency and adherence to promises are essential in public life, and any deviation from these principles must be addressed.
The remarks underline the intensifying political confrontation in Delhi, with the ‘Sheesh Mahal’ issue emerging as a key point of contention over governance, accountability, and public perception.
