New Delhi, Delhi, India
Amid ongoing global discussions on the Iran ceasefire and its wider implications, Abdullah Abu Shawesh, Ambassador of Palestine to India, highlighted the strategic, political, and humanitarian dimensions of the conflict and its aftermath.
Speaking in New Delhi, Shawesh underlined the importance of the Strait of Hormuz, describing it as a critical geopolitical tool for Iran. “Iran used this strait as the most significant leverage,” he said, pointing to its role in global energy supply and regional power dynamics.
He also offered a sharp assessment of the objectives behind the conflict. Referring to the involvement of United States and Israel, Shawesh stated, “This war was started with a clear goal of changing the Iranian regime, but they killed them, not changed them. There is a huge difference,” suggesting that the intended outcomes were not achieved.
According to him, the ceasefire was linked to conditions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz. “This war ended on the condition of the opening of the Strait of Hormuz, which was open before the war,” he remarked, questioning the strategic gains of the conflict.
Addressing the broader regional impact, Shawesh emphasized that the consequences of the war were not confined to one country. “Not just the region but the effects of this war affected everyone, particularly in our region,” he said, highlighting the widespread repercussions across West Asia.
He specifically pointed to the situation in Palestine, stating that the conflict had adverse effects on the ground. “In Palestine, we were negatively affected by this war as Israel used it to expand its settlements,” he alleged, linking the regional conflict to developments in Palestinian territories.
Raising concerns over the humanitarian situation, Shawesh added, “The genocide in Gaza continues. Yesterday, 10 Palestinians were killed in Gaza,” drawing attention to ongoing violence in the region.
The remarks come as global leaders and analysts continue to assess the impact of the Iran ceasefire on regional stability, energy security, and geopolitical alignments.
Shawesh’s statements reflect a critical perspective on the conflict, highlighting both strategic calculations and humanitarian concerns, while underscoring the far-reaching consequences of the war beyond Iran and the United States.
